Rep. Duncan Introduces the Hearing Protection Act - GOA

FN Forum

Google Search
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thanks Tree77Thanks

Thread: Rep. Duncan Introduces the Hearing Protection Act - GOA

  1. #1
    Senior Member Magnificent_Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    694
    Thanked
    834 times

    Rep. Duncan Introduces the Hearing Protection Act - GOA

    Please write to your Representatives and tell them to support Rep. Duncan and the Hearing Protection Act!!

    Write to your Rep, via GOA

    Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) on January 9, 2017,
    introduced the Hearing Protection Act, restoring your right to buy suppressors for your firearms.
    Under Rep. Duncan’s bill, H.R. 367, anyone who can legally buy a gun can buy a suppressor.
    This legislation has tremendous grassroots support.
    But it also has the support of someone who has the ear of President-elect Donald Trump: the incoming president’s eldest son, Donald Jr.
    “It’s a safety issue,” Trump, Jr., said in a September interview, referring to impact a noise reduction device can have on the user’s and spectator’s hearing.
    Contrary to pop culture myth, a suppressor does not “silence” a weapon. It does, however, decrease the sound level by around 30-35 decibels.
    In most cases, the noise level would be approximately what the shooter experiences wearing common hearing protection without a suppressor.
    In other words, while a suppressed shot might not be heard ‘round the world,’ it is far from silent.
    Gun control groups are, predictably, outraged over even this modest safety bill.
    “Silencers are military-bred accessories that make it easier for criminals to take innocent lives,” said Kristen Rand, Legislative Director of the Violence Policy Center in a statement last year.
    The facts don’t line up with Ms. Rand’s position. Though suppressors have been legal to own for more than one hundred years, they are rarely used in the commission of a crime.
    In one California study that covered a ten-year period, suppressors were used in only one-tenth of one percent of all homicides.
    Suppressors are not preferred by criminals. As the National Shooting Sports Foundation points out, this is “likely due to the fact that they do not silence firearms like in the movies, they are ineffective on revolvers, they prevent the proper function of most semiautomatic handguns without the addition of a special piston system and they make firearms longer and heavier, which makes them more difficult to conceal.”
    So while suppressors protect the hearing of shooters, including the young and hearing-impaired, they are of almost no value to criminals or mass shooters. Even homemade suppressors are rarely used in crimes.
    They are effectively banned for one reason -- because gun grabbers want to make it more difficult for gun owners to exercise their rights.
    Ironically, in some countries which have the strictest gun control in the world -- such as the UK, France and Norway -- ownership of suppressors is encouraged by the authorities and considered to be “polite.”
    In the U.S. House, GOA is pushing to garner enough cosponsors to make it impossible to ignore by the Republican leadership.
    GOA is also working on companion legislation in the U.S. Senate, where its prospects are a little more dicey.
    The new Minority Leader, Chuck Schumer (D-NY), will filibuster this bill (thus requiring a 60-vote super majority) faster than you can say “suppressors aren’t silencers!”.
    But Republicans hold a 52-48 majority -- and there are ten Democrats up for reelection in 2018 who come from states carried by Donald Trump -- so there is a window of opportunity in the new Congress.
    And having the vocal support of Donald Trump, Jr., will help to educate the public on what he views as a “health issue” for gun owners.
    As for the support of the incoming president, Trump Jr., predicts that if it makes it to his desk, “he is obviously going to be for it.”
    Please urge your member of Congress to co-sponsor H.R. 367.


    M1P90, LESTER, hillbillyjim and 5 others thanked this.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Originally Posted by Ferris2son
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    .357 Magnum: Because shooting twice is silly


  2. #2
    FN Supporter
    FN Supporter
    Mntsnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,522
    Thanked
    1592 times
    Submitted letters to my Representative as well as the other reps from the State of Utah
    - Mike -

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Benefactor Life Member

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Life Member

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
    Ambassador Life Member
    FN Gear
    Scar 17s FDE
    FNX-45 Tactical FDE (Twins)
    FNX-45 Blk
    FiveSeveN FDE
    My Oath to defend our nation against all enemies... was and is still an oath for me.

  3. #3
    Sponsor
    FN Supporter
    M1P90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    4,067
    Thanked
    2644 times
    Done! But it will fall on deaf ears and blind eyes here in Massachusetts.
    Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
    "If you wish for peace, prepare for war"


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    FNForum.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,069
    Thanked
    1165 times
    Done, the tide is turning. Even if y our rep won't vote for it they get enough emails like that they will be wary of making much of a stink against it in congress.

  6. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    24
    Thanked
    23 times
    Quote Originally Posted by M1P90 View Post
    Done! But it will fall on deaf ears and blind eyes here in Massachusetts.
    Yup, and here in NY they'll most likely ban them even though legal at the federal level. Must get my house ready to sell this spring.

  7. #6
    FN Supporter
    FN Supporter
    hillbillyjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Posts
    2,402
    Thanked
    4504 times
    At least you guys can use whatever bathroom you like lol

    so can I get my tax money back?

  8. #7
    Senior Member aquaticpig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    950
    Thanked
    1130 times
    Thanks for sharing the GOA link. It's nice to send out emails requesting positive legislation, not demanding they stop negative legislation.
    Esse quam videri

  9. #8
    FN Supporter
    FN Supporter
    dank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,238
    Thanked
    4124 times
    Done!

    Thank you for taking action to protect the Second Amendment.

    Your message for "Rep. Duncan Introduces the Hearing Protection Act" was sent on 01/11/2017 11:08 AM to the following recipients: Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO).

  10. #9
    FN Supporter
    FN Supporter
    dank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,238
    Thanked
    4124 times
    Quote Originally Posted by hillbillyjim View Post
    so can I get my tax money back?


    From what I understand every suppressor bought after Oct 22 2015, you will get your $200.00 back if the bill makes it!


    start the video at the 3:00 minute mark I'm pretty sure they go over it in the video.. (they do at the 6:40mark)




    LESTER, hillbillyjim, Mntsnow and 3 others thanked this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    241
    Thanked
    50 times
    If this actually makes it through, I'm curious how this will affect states like CA and NY were suppressors are a major no go.
    SeaMac thanked this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Cornyn introduces Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2014
    By P-Factor in forum 2nd Amendment and General Gun News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-18-2014, 03:10 AM
  2. Hearing Protection
    By SCARMD in forum Freestyle Room
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-22-2012, 11:18 PM
  3. Hearing Protection
    By CarlosT in forum Freestyle Room
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 07:48 AM
  4. Hearing Protection
    By carrera9930 in forum FN SCAR 17S
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 10:24 PM
  5. Hearing Protection
    By 805coach in forum FNP Accessories
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 11:03 PM

Tags for this Thread