Eotech or Aimpoint

[ShipWreck]

Can anyone provide ball park costs and pros and cons of each?

Thx!

There are several versions of both. But this is a great deal on the Eotech. About $30 less than the avg price online:

http://www.fnforum.net/viewtopic.php?t=2259&highlight=

[RojasTKD]

It's not a PS90 but here is a pic of my FS2000 with a OETech and a C-more sight.

I think the C-more would be make a great sight for the PS90. Smaller profile, less expensive and adaquate for the distances the PS90 would be used at, as it more of a CQB weapon.

I curently have the EOTech on my AR-15 and the C-more on my FS2000.
When I get a PS90 It will be sporting a C-more. Not sure if the FS2000 will get another optic or stay with the C-more.








Of the two you mention, I lean towars the EOTech.

Just picture in C-More on here instead.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...tCompM4001.jpg

[ShipWreck]

Nice!

[Thorfinn]

Eotech no question.

Any optic mounted on a rail on a PS90 is going to be unusually high in relation to the boreline. Kind of like a scope mounted on top of an AR15 carry handle.

That, plus the fairly dramatic trajectory arc of the round makes your POI very different at different ranges (25 vs 50 vs 100 etc..)

The multiple reference points on an eotech reticle are extremely helpful in hitting where you want to with precision at different ranges.

[andygold]

For a PS90 with the tri-rail which do you recommend. Eotech 512 or Aimpoint? Thanks,

Let me first state that I have not used either the Aimpoint or the Eotech, although I have picked up and turned on an Eotech in a store. The following is based on assumptions that might be totally wrong, or totally right.....

I have the USSS sight on my PS90 and a Trijicon TA11 on my AR. The thing that I find somewhat disconcerting is that both of my sights are of the tube type, where if you don't have accurate cheek/chin weld, you're not going to be able to see through the sight. At a quick raise of the weapon to the shoulder, I don't always have the proper angle to see perfectly down the tube. I typically need to do some sort of adjustment to get the proper view through the sight. Maybe with a lot of training and repetition and muscle memory taking over, I could get my head in line with the sights quicker. That being said, I'm making a big assumption that the Eotech the C'More, and other similar sights all without the long tube would give you quicker target acquisition, without having to get the perfect cheek weld to get your eye inline with the tube.

Again, I may be wrong as I've never used either, but I'd think that the Eotech without the long tube would give you faster target acquisition. There might be reasons why the Aimpoint is a better unit, but I'm assuming it might give you the same issues I have with my tube type sights.

[cajunpapapump]

Yep I love my eotech 512, man it made a diffences in my life.