Yeah, but I don't think anybody wants to discuss the long term effects of UV, solvents, and heat/cold on polymer mags.Originally Posted by mptoledo
Too boring and I don't think there are many chemical engineers roaming around here...
![]()
07/02 SOT Manufacturer, Suppressors, NFA Firearms, and everything else COOL!
Not a chem eng, but yeah, that stuff does get boring. That's why I'm moving away from chemistry (got sick of it).Originally Posted by SgtStrykerUSMC43
I'm not sure what polymer they used, but it may be UV resistant. The way most people use their mags, I wouldn't be concerned about UV related issues for a long time (unless you're tanning with them daily, but then there's other issues going on not related to the mags)
-Dan
"I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker."
Voltaire
Black plastic tends to have less UV damage, except for the surface area, since the UV cannot get through the whole thinkness of the plastic. Translucent plastic suffers the worst UV damage.
I am speaking of Zip Ties BTW. Using Zip Ties outdoors, use black not white.
White Zip Ties break down from UV.
![]()
11:00 P.M. EST Nov 4th, 2008, My nightmare came true...
12:00 P.M. EST Jan 20th, 2009, screwing began...
10:00 P.M. EST SUNDAY Mar 21st 2010, healthcare SHOVED down our throats!
Tuesday Nov 6th, 2012, We can CHANGE the president.
Oh, better living through Chemistry... wait, thats a different kind of Chemistry.![]()
![]()
11:00 P.M. EST Nov 4th, 2008, My nightmare came true...
12:00 P.M. EST Jan 20th, 2009, screwing began...
10:00 P.M. EST SUNDAY Mar 21st 2010, healthcare SHOVED down our throats!
Tuesday Nov 6th, 2012, We can CHANGE the president.
I like my PMAGs. Not only do they drop freely, but they really give a sleek look that complements the SCAR well.
Using a Dremel tool makes filing the edge of the PMAG a snap (and very clean).
Thanks for that!Originally Posted by trex021
Hey, if you like the Brownell's mags, knock yourself out. Nothing wrong with them, they are a nice magazine (I have some myself). I just prefer PMAGs. With this fix in place, I don't anticipate any need for repair issues. But as with all PMODs (Peculiar Modifications), I realize I'm taking a certain amount of personal liability on. But given I'm SBRing my SCAR, I probably would have bigger issues with warranty work that using a non-OEM magOriginally Posted by Clyde
I prefer PMAGs. I think they offer a step up over aluminum USGI mags. So I'm willing to tinker a bit to get them to work properly if I can.
I'm flattered! I'll give my opinions on your questions:Originally Posted by mptoledo
1.) It appears so... so long as you cut enough material that the bolt catch moves freely. The fix also works for the Lancer L5, but because of the design of the follower (the bolt catch tab is too narrow), the bolt catch can slip off the side and fail to hold the bolt open on the last round.
Ultimately we won't know if this problem caused the unusual bolt wear, and if this problem fixed it for a few thousand rounds and multiple users.
2.) Polymer mags can degrade under certain UV and chemical conditions. But they are less subject to deformation when dropped, etc. Ultimately magazines are replaceable wear items. When they degrade, replace them. My other area of concern is feed lip thickness. The feedlips are a little thicker than the OEM mags and clearance between the feedlips and the bolt carrier is pretty small. That might force the carrier up a very small amount. But it doesn't look like it to me at this point. I will be investigating further.
Edit: follow-up. Under normal conditions (that is, no pressure on the bottom of the magazine), both the OEM mag and the PMAG feed lips clear the bolt carrier as it comes forward. If, however, there is pressure on the bottom of the mag (as when using it as a monopod), both the OEM mag AND the PMAG very slightly interfere with the bolt carrier coming forward. I eyeball the interference as about .1 mm for the OEM mag and .2 mm for the PMAG. Neither one cuases significant interference and the carrier comes forward easily, even without the action spring pressure (I removed the action spring so I can move the bolt really slowly). Wheres the carrier being raised by the bolt catch when using an unmodified PMAG is obvious to me as I was observing the bolt motion, I cannot detect the upward displacement caused by this issue. It's probably there, just VERY slight. Unless you spend a lot of time shooting prone using brand new mags as a monopod, I don't think this will be an issue. Otherwise, your mags will quickly acquire a little lap wear and this won't happen at all.
Old story, Back in the late sixty's Goodyear Aerospace made a deal with the Phoenix Police Dept. to furnish all of our Motorcycles with bullet proof windshields. This was prompted by one of our officers being killed at a traffic stop. The bullet had gone through the clear Plexiglas windshields we were using at the time. The new windshields were very thick yellow tinted material, the same as used on fighter cockpits at the time. After years of service in the Arizona sun (don't remember exactly how many), we discovered that the material had lost it's ability to stop rifle bullets. Before this discovery, this phenomenon had not been addressed. It caused some changes in how the cockpits were protected from the AZ sun on the flight line and prompted some changes to the material itself.Originally Posted by SONYtec
FN SCAR 16
FNP 45 Tactical
Glock 19 (26 years old)
S&W Mod 66 (34 years old)
S&W Mod 60 (25 years old)